“Trump administration admits canceling clean energy grants to Democratic states”
What actually happened
The Department of Energy terminated 284 federal grants worth roughly $7.5bn in October, all but one located in states that voted for Kamala Harris in 2024. In a court filing responding to a lawsuit by University of California researchers, DOE's counsel wrote that the selection was "based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient's state, ie, whether the recipient's location and/or place of performance was in a Blue State or a non-Blue State." The department disputes that this equals a political motive for the terminations themselves, saying the timing, not the substance, was political.
Key facts
- DOE reviewed more than 2,300 financial assistance awards, with 624 marked "termination" or "cancel," of which 284 were ultimately terminated in October 2025.
- "With one exception, the 284 terminated grants had a recipient location and/or at least one place of performance in a state that awarded its electoral votes to Kamala Harris in the 2024 election and has two Democratic-caucusing Senators."
- DOE's filing states it "will not contend that it looked beyond the prime grantee(s) to consider the political identity or geographic distribution of downstream beneficiaries of the grant funds."
- Russ Vought announced the cuts on X as "Nearly $8 billion in Green New Scam funding to fuel the Left's climate agenda is being canceled."
- DOE left in place 340 other grants it had flagged for possible cancellation, all in Trump-voting states, per The Hill's reporting of the same filing.
- A DOE spokesperson called the NYT's initial report a "misrepresentation," insisting the admission concerned announcement timing, not termination decisions.
What to watch for
Watch the Energy Department's Inspector General investigation, launched in December after a Democratic letter to the acting IG, for whether it corroborates or contradicts the court filing's "based solely" language. Also watch how DOE's litigation posture in Thakur v. Trump evolves given a related January ruling that a judge found the terminations violated the Fifth Amendment on similar facts.
