Rubbish Talk app Cut the spin.
Read the facts.
Suspicious of a headline?
Check it.
Rubbish Check
Fox Business · 19 August 2026 source

“LARRY KUDLOW: Rising Bond Yields from Trumpian Growth, not Trumpian Inflation”

R5/ 10
Selective
Rubbish Rating — 1 = base fact, 10 = pure rubbish
12345678910
In short
Rubbish Talk rates Fox Business's Kudlow column a 5/10 because the core mechanism he cites (flat inflation breakevens, rising real yields) checks out against market data, but the column credits the real-yield rise entirely to "growth" while omitting the term-premium and fiscal-supply concerns that bond strategists more commonly cite.
The Verdict
Selective. The headline is honestly labelled as Kudlow's opinion, not straight news, and his central data point (breakevens flat, real yields up) is broadly correct. It scores a 5 rather than a 2 because he presents one plausible explanation for rising real yields as the only explanation, never engaging with the competing story, deficit and Treasury-supply worries, that most bond-market commentary points to.

What actually happened

Kudlow argues the recent rise in long-term Treasury yields, roughly 35 basis points on the 30-year and about 50 basis points on the 10-year this year, is driven by stronger real growth expectations rather than inflation fears. He points to CPI breakeven rates that have stayed roughly flat while the real (TIPS) yield component has climbed, and frames current 4%-plus yields as a "normalization" toward pre-2008 levels rather than a warning sign.

Key facts

  • Market data corroborates the mechanism: the 10-year breakeven inflation rate (T10YIE) sat around 2.28% in late July 2026, broadly stable rather than rising sharply.
  • 10-year TIPS real yields were around 2.3% in mid-2026, consistent with Kudlow's claim that the real-yield component, not the inflation component, has driven nominal yields higher.
  • Kudlow's specific figures (30-year up ~35bps, 10-year up ~50bps, breakeven move under 5bps) come only from his own column text; independent confirmation of the exact basis-point moves was not separately verified beyond the directional breakeven/real-yield split.
  • The column attributes the entire real-yield increase to "faster, more powerful growth" without citing any economist, Fed official, or bond strategist naming term premium, fiscal deficits, or Treasury issuance supply as contributing factors, all standard alternative explanations in bond-market commentary.

What to watch for

  • Watch whether the 10-year breakeven stays anchored near 2.2-2.3% or starts climbing, that would undercut the "it's growth, not inflation" thesis.
  • Watch for Fed commentary or Treasury auction demand data (bid-to-cover ratios) in coming weeks, weak demand would point toward supply/term-premium pressure rather than pure growth optimism.
  • Watch whether other outlets' coverage of the same yield move cites term premium or deficit concerns; if so, that confirms this column selectively picked the flattering explanation.
About this scoreThe R-Score is Rubbish Talk's editorial opinion on how far a headline's framing sits from what the underlying facts support. It is a judgement about presentation and emphasis, not an allegation that any outlet has acted dishonestly. Every figure we rely on is linked under Receipts so you can check it yourself.
Share this CheckXFacebookLinkedInEmail